Since the goal of this little project is to actually read my geli-encrypted zfs filesystems on a Linux laptop, I had to get a USB enclosure that supports drives bigger than 2TB; I also got a model which supports USB 3.0. The news I have is:
Ungeli and zfs-on-linux work for this task. I was able to read files and verify that their content was the same as on the Debian kFreeBSD system.
The raw disk I tested with (WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0) gets ~155MiB/s at the start, ~120MiB at the middle, and ~75MiB/s at the end of the first partition according to zcav. Even though ungeli has had no serious attempt at optimization, it achieves over 90% of this read rate when zcav is run on /dev/nbd0 instead of /dev/sdb1, up to 150MiB/s at the start of the device while consuming about 50%CPU.
(My CPU does have AES instructions but I don't know for certain whether my OpenSSL uses them the way I've written the software. I do use the envelope functions, so I expect that it will. "openssl speed -evp aes-128-xts" gets over 2GB/s on 1024- and 8192-byte blocks)
Unfortunately, zfs read speeds are not that hot. Running md5sum on 2500 files totalling 2GB proceeded at an average of less than 35MB/s. I don't have a figure for this specific device when it's attached to (k)FreeBSD via sata, but I did note that the same disk scrubs at 90MB/s. On the other hand, doing a similar test on my kFreeBSD machine (but on the raidz pool I have handy, not a volume made from a single disk) I also md5sum at about 35MB/s, so maybe this is simply what zfs performance is.
All in all, I'm simply happy to know that I can now read my backups on either Linux or (k)FreeBSD.
The geli infrastructure is strongly linked with FreeBSD and I didn't discover any documentation of the data formats. So, in the wake of my concerns about being able to read backups on Linux I read a lot of freebsd source code and now I've written a portable (I hope) userspace program which can decrypt at least a toy geli-encrypted volume.
It's called ungeli and I'm going to try letting it live on github instead of a personal git repo. So far it's a toy in that I've only tested it on a toy volume, the performance is not tuned, but it does seem to work and due to is smallness (<600SLOC at present) it may be a useful second reference if you too wish to understand geli.
Update: I added nbd support and squashed some bugs. Now I've succeeded in retrieving files from a geli-encrypted zfs volume on Linux using zfs-on-linux:
# ./ungeli -j geli-passfile npool.img /dev/nbd0 & # zpool import -d /dev -o readonly=on npool # (imports /dev/nbd0) # cat /npool/example/GPL-3 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 3, 29 June 2007 Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <http://fsf.org/> ...
As I recently discussed, I use zfs replication for my off-site backups, manually moving volumes from my home to a second location on a semi-regular schedule.
Of course, I would rather that if one of these drives were stolen or lost that the thief not have a copy of all my data. Therefore, I use geli to encrypt the entire zpool.
All older entries
Website Copyright © 2004-2018 Jeff Epler